Comments on: Egocentric Intelligent Design

By: Idetrorce

Idetrorce — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:00:46 +0000

very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
Idetrorce

By: Michael J

Michael J — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:46:01 +0000

I’ve seen variations of the same hypothesis in a few science fiction stories. It’s a great one for getting around the who created the creator. A few actually go back and start the big bang as well.

By: Dr. G

Dr. G — Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:23:10 +0000

You’ve been touched by his noodly appendage, have you?

By: daharja

daharja — Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:56:53 +0000

Personally, I worship the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Far more credible that ID, if you ask me.

By: lambic

lambic — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:24:03 +0000

Yes, I’ve been touched by his noodly appendage.

By: hugh

hugh — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 18:55:16 +0000

have you heard of flying spaghetti monsterism? the FSMists are lobbying to have their theories taught in science classes too. They think biology class should be split into:
“One third time for Intelligent Design, one third time for Flying Spaghetti Monsterism, and one third time for logical conjecture based on overwhelming observable evidence.”

see:
http://www.venganza.org/