Is it acupuncture or is it ECT?
I came across this article at the BBC about a study that claims that Acupuncture ‘cuts blood pressure’
. I found this a little hard to swallow, so I read on.
What the study actually found was Acupuncture combined with electronic stimulation can lower high blood pressure
. So wait a minute, they’re sticking needles in rats, then passing an electric current through them. Is that acupuncture? I thought acupuncture was an ancient Chinese healing technique. Since when did the ancient Chinese have electricity?
Either it’s acupuncture, or it’s giving people/rats electric shocks. As far as I can tell there hasn’t been any attempt to test the electric shock treatment on its own, but the article does say: When the acupuncture was applied on its own, it had no effect on blood pressure.
So in other words, acupuncture, that ancient chinese healing technique, did nothing.
The lead researcher, Dr Longhurst then goes on to say: “This suggests that acupuncture can be an excellent complement to other medical treatments, especially for those treating the cardiac system.” No, no, wait, it doesn’t suggest anything of the kind. It suggests that giving people mild electric shocks might have some temporary beneficial effect on blood pressure. The only thing it suggests about acupuncture is that it doesn’t do anything.
Misleading headlines like Acupuncture ‘cuts blood pressure’
give people false hope and keep the alternative medicine bandwagon rolling along. Shame on you BBC.






…but I thought that acupuncture is virtually the only alternative medicine that *does* have some evidence to back up its efficacy. Though, on the other hand, there is also the case of St. John’s Wort, which, in Germany has been prescribed by MD’s as a firstline of defence for depression, ahead of prozac(!), for a good ten years now…
As far as I know there is no concrete evidence of the efficacy of acupuncture, but I’m not an expert so I’d be happy to be proved wrong. I know a three year study back in the 90s found it to be no better than a placebo.
That wasn’t the point of this post though. The study I’m questioning claimed to show the efficacy of acupuncture when in fact it did no such thing. If there is any evidence that acupuncture has some beneficial value, this study wasn’t it.
I had a quick look around, and Wikipedia had the best summary of acupuncture research:
further scientific information about acupuncture:
http://www.gerac.de, site language german, english
acupuncture works, no doubt, for anything
Several studies have been done on acupuncture.
Here’s another one proving / showing the existence of meridians, the places where acupuncturists place needles.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1810370
Yes, and none of the well performed ones have found anything beyond placebo.
Hmm, it’s a bit of a leap to go from finding tiny threadlike structures to calling them meridians.